Banks & Trade Finance

Captive reinsurance can be a practical and disciplined lever in trade finance and receivables financing—when it is designed to complement credit insurance capacity and improve risk allocation and capital efficiency.

This sits at a specialist intersection: banking × credit insurance × reinsurance structuring × capital management.

Context

The friction is not insurance. It is capacity and capital.

Trade finance, factoring, and receivables financing rely heavily on credit insurance to unlock limits and manage portfolio concentration. The constraint typically arises where insurer capacity stops—often for reasons unrelated to underlying loss experience.

Common constraints we see
  • Credit insurers reduce or withdraw capacity on segments that remain strategically relevant.
  • Portfolios become constrained for regulatory or methodological reasons rather than true loss economics.
  • Capital intensity increases as volatility and concentration rise, putting pressure on pricing and growth.
  • Existing captives (where present) are often disconnected from trade finance and receivables strategy.
Approach

Using a captive to support the right part of the book.

A captive does not eliminate risk and does not replace the market. It allows the bank to selectively absorb defined, bounded slices of risk—so insurers continue to provide scale while constrained segments are addressed deliberately.

What this enables (when done correctly)
Capacity support
Complement insurer limits on targeted obligors, sectors, or tranches without reopening the entire portfolio.
Risk allocation
Allocate risk between market, captive, and balance sheet based on loss economics and volatility.
Stability
Reduce renewal volatility and insurer cyclicality by controlling the edge layers of the book.
Capital efficiency
Transform portions of pure banking credit risk into structured insurance risk under well-governed conditions.

Value is created at the boundary between underwriting reality, reinsurance mechanics, and governance discipline.

How we help

Decision-grade structuring, not theory.

We support banks in designing captive and reinsurance structures specifically connected to trade finance and receivables portfolios. Our role is to translate strategy into a structure that stands up to risk, finance, and governance scrutiny.

Typical workstreams
  • Portfolio segmentation and identification of target risk slices.
  • Reinsurance architecture design aligned with capacity and capital objectives.
  • Fronting, collateral, and credit support mechanics.
  • Captive structure selection (pure captive, cell, or hybrid).
  • Governance, operating model, and board-level documentation.
Engagement type
Structured advisory
Partners
Works with your broker
Compensation
No commissions
Start here

A pragmatic entry path.

For most banks, the first step is not “build a captive.” It is confirming where a captive changes the economics and what conditions must be met for it to work.

Recommended sequencing
  1. Assessment: confirm economic relevance, capital impact, and target segments.
  2. Structure sprint: select captive form and define risk and reinsurance architecture.
  3. Implementation scope: prepare documentation for execution partners and internal governance.

Where a captive already exists, we start by clarifying its current role—and why it is or is not achieving the bank’s objectives.

Exploring captive support for trade finance or receivables?

We can recommend the right first step and define a clean scope aligned to your portfolio, governance, and capital constraints.

Contact