Two structured entry engagements that clarify whether captive solutions are economically relevant—and what the right next step should be.
Typically relevant when annual insurance premium spend exceeds €500,000.
These are paid, time-bounded assignments designed for CFOs, CROs, Risk Directors, and Boards who need clarity before committing to a larger programme redesign or captive build.
We work alongside your broker, captive manager, legal and tax advisers—without disintermediating any party. We do not take commissions or contingent compensation.
If an assessment indicates “not ready,” we specify what is missing. If it indicates “ready,” we document why and define a clean scope for execution.
A structured review of your current insurance programme and (if applicable) your captive’s role—built to identify the economic levers that matter most.
Designed to reduce renewal-driven decisions and establish a clean basis for captive expansion, redesign, or a feasibility sprint.
A fast, decision-grade feasibility engagement: what a captive could retain, how it should be structured, and which structure fits your constraints.
This is designed to define an execution scope cleanly—so brokers and service providers can implement without ambiguity.
We prioritise organisations with complex insurance programmes and meaningful premium spend. If the decision is not senior, not time-relevant, or not economically material, we will tell you quickly.
We do not disintermediate brokers. We are independent from placement economics.
If your organisation spends more than €500k per year in insurance premiums, we can recommend the right first step and define a clean scope.